Thursday, August 11, 2005


Given the numerous and often conflicting angles that have been worked on that whole gay Iranian rape teen thing, I was thrilled when Tyler bounced me a link to this article in The Nation, which offers a thoughtful, reasoned overview of the less-than-thoughtful, sometimes irrational reportage surrounding the story. No, it doesn't get to the heart of the matter--what really happened in Iran?--concluding instead, like that guy in the Tootsie Pop commercial or so many grad school papers in the morally relative, Foucault-loving 1990s, that the world may never know. Still, it's a good play-by-play as far as following the press releases goes.



The one thing that the author misses, though--or at least fails to point out--is the wacko language that some folks are/were using in reponding to the story. The most egregious examples come from--quel surprise-- Andrew Sullivan and the Log Cabin Republicans, both of whom cite the hangings in Iran as further justification for the War on Terror.



Huh?



I mean, no, it's not terribly shocking that Republicans--gay or not--would follow in the former footsteps of our Vacationer-in-Chief by conflating terrorism, the Iraq war, and the struggle to quell Islamic fundamentalism, but that doesn't make the conflation any more valid. Seriously, how does the War on Terror (begun in the wake of September 11, 2001 to rout out terrorists) have anything to do with Iraq (invaded on phony claims of WMDs and later recast as a war of "liberation") or with the hangings of two kids (who may or may not have been gay and/or rapists)? Hell, even G.W. learned his lesson on that one, having launched his own failed attempt at consolidating and rebranding.



Now, don't get me wrong: I'm no apologist for terrorism, extremism, or intolerance. Having grown up in Mississippi, I'm particularly familiar with the last two, and I'm well aware that all three are related. That relationship, though, is a complex one that needs to be countered in a thoughtful, intelligent, nuanced way. That doesn't preclude using military metaphors--or military action for that matter--but there ain't much nuance in a bullet.

7:34 AM
permalink     0 comment[s]     subscribe


archives

May 2000   June 2000   July 2000   August 2000   September 2000   October 2000   November 2000   December 2000   January 2001   February 2001   March 2001   April 2001   May 2001   June 2001   July 2001   August 2001   September 2001   October 2001   November 2001   December 2001   January 2002   February 2002   March 2002   April 2002   May 2002   June 2002   July 2002   August 2002   September 2002   October 2002   November 2002   December 2002   January 2003   February 2003   March 2003   April 2003   May 2003   June 2003   July 2003   August 2003   September 2003   October 2003   November 2003   December 2003   January 2004   February 2004   March 2004   April 2004   May 2004   June 2004   July 2004   August 2004   September 2004   October 2004   November 2004   December 2004   January 2005   February 2005   March 2005   April 2005   May 2005   June 2005   July 2005   August 2005   September 2005   October 2005   November 2005   December 2005   January 2006   February 2006   March 2006   April 2006   May 2006   June 2006   July 2006   August 2006   September 2006   October 2006   November 2006   December 2006   January 2007   February 2007   March 2007   April 2007   May 2007   June 2007   July 2007   August 2007   September 2007   October 2007   November 2007   December 2007   January 2008   February 2008   March 2008   April 2008   May 2008   June 2008   July 2008   August 2008   September 2008   October 2008   November 2008   December 2008   January 2009   February 2009   March 2009   April 2009   May 2009   June 2009   July 2009   August 2009   September 2009   October 2009   November 2009   December 2009   January 2010   February 2010   March 2010  

FeedBurner.com